Tuesday, November 18, 2008

A third to a half of the world's tax havens in Europe?

Daniel Lebègue, president of Transparency International France, has been speaking about tax havens. He is (among other things) a former director-general of the Caisse des Dépôts (a French public sector financial institution) and a former vice chairman of the French bank BNP, and should know a thing or two about them. He said (translating from French):

"About fifty tax havens exist around the world, about half in Europe. By "tax haven" I mean a state where there is a very low level of taxes. This state practices secrecy and refuses all co-operation with other countries."

A couple of points about this. First, we recently said in The Guardian newspaper that tax havens provide not one, but three things: low or zero taxes, secrecy, and lax regulation. Lebègue is right and we should add a fourth, which one could treat as separately from the third: a refusal to co-operate with other jurisdictions (see some of the quotes from Eva Joly, for example, to get an idea of how serious this problem can be.) There is some disagreement about how many of these criteria a country needs to exhibit to be called a tax haven, and note that these places (secrecy jurisdictions, we often prefer to call them) routinely try to pretend that they are not tax havens.

Second, it may come as a surprise to see him saying that about half the world's tax havens are in Europe. We have a slightly larger list, on p36-37 of this document, showing 26 European tax havens (which would add up to over half his 50 havens, though our list contains 73 such places, giving the European ones a one-third share of the global total.) This makes the recent remarks by the crime-fighting French magistrate Renaud van Ruymbeke, who said Europe should first "clean out its own rubbish" in the fight against tax havens, especially pertinent. As an aside, TJN recently reduced the number to 72 after removing Nauru, which appears to have changed its ways. As another aside, the methodology used for calculating the number of tax havens involved looking at whether or not jurisdictions carried out effective information exchange (that is, automatic exchange of tax and other information with other jurisdictions) and whether they met the "economic substance" test: that is, non-resident companies must have some real economic substance within the jurisdiction; the OECD dropped its economic substance test some time around 2000, under strong pressure from the International Trade and Investment Organisation (ITIO,) a powerful tax haven lobby group with especially strong British interests.

Lebègue continues:

"Among the 50 sure-fire tax havens there are also banking and financial havens: that is to say states where financial actors are set up and which operate outside all surveillance, and in complete opacity. Four thousand banks are set up there. . . tax havens represent a considerable risk for the international financial system. And hedge funds, two thirds of which are registered in tax havens, are feeding the financial crisis since investors no longer have confidence in these opaque and unsupervised actors."

And he adds:

"There will be no remaking of the international finanancial system, that is to say more transparency, if we leave the black hole of tax havens to persist. Half of international financial transactions transit through them, in effect. The current crisis gives strength to those who want to finish with clandestine finance.

To put things in order, it is necessary now to establish rapidly a list of non-co-operative countries. We will then ask that state no longer provide guarantees or aid to banks which have their headquarters in tax havens, like UBS or Credit Suisse. The same for companies. Why should France provide export credit for companies whose headquarters are situated in the secrecy jurisdictions? And it is necessary to forbid the distribution of hedge funds which do not give information about their shareholdings, their risks, and their off balance sheet financing."

Sensible words.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

It seems that no one here in Canada is paying attention to tax havens. Yes, You can find the odd reference to the subject in papers, magazines and dailies. Jim Flaherty, our current federal finance minister, even talked about looking at them once, I believe. But this guy's Party is really a source of tax justice, to say the least. (And where is that talk by him now?) But that's it.

I don't expect the corporatocracy to pay attention to this subject in any manner that would be helpful to the majority. But I often turn to the Progressive Economics Forum and it's blog for info on the economic and business news items that pop up in the Toronto Star. Contrary to what some goofy people say, The Star is not leftwing. On the contrary. But it happens to be the daily I read.

The PEF is frequented and run by leftwing professional - not hobby - economists. I just read a (PEF) blog post by Andrew Jackson conveying his view of the usefulness or lack thereof of the recent G20 soiree. I just don't get how progressives can ignore tax havens. I can't add two plus two and possess a grade 10 education, barely. But I get why tax havens are bad. And with the help of whistleblowers like John Perkins and researchers like TJN, I can even penetrate the subject a little ways; enough, you'd think, that I might be able to provocatively raise the subject with others who have training as economists and the ability therefore to recognize the importance of the subject, especially in the context of a global financial meltdown. Sheesh!

http://www.progressive-economics.ca/2008/11/17/the-g20-summit-falls-short/

Oh well. Regular people like myself who I talk to get it. I'm sure that the leftwing economists on the PEF get it too. But, What makes them fearful to talk the specific solution of going after tax havens? Does the corporatocracy visit everyone with reminders of their dark secrets or what?

Rick Battams

9:11 pm  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home